PDA

View Full Version : Freedom and the Scrotum


Morvran
02-19-07, 06:51 AM
Linky: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/6375501.stm

Schools shun book over one word
A children's author has said she is "horrified" after her book was banned from some US schools and libraries.
Susan Patron's award-winning The Higher Power of Lucky has run into trouble because it contains the word "scrotum".

Schools in several states are refusing to stock the book, intended for ages nine to 12, which won the prestigious Newbery Medal for children's fiction.

Some librarians posting on message boards said the book "misjudged its audience" and used "shock treatment".

The offending word appears early on in the book when the heroine, Lucky Trimble, overhears a man talking about a snakebite to his dog.


I'd be appalled that my school librarian had decided to take on the role of censor and deny my child access to a major award-winning book
Susan Patron
Author
She is described as thinking the word is "medical and secret, but also important".

Patron, a librarian herself, condemned the idea of stopping families choosing reading material for themselves.

"I was shocked and horrified to read that some school librarians, teachers, and media specialists are choosing not to include the 2007 Newbery Medal winner in their collections," she wrote in Publishers Weekly.

Those people were afraid of parental objections or were uncomfortable with the word themselves, she said.

"If I were a parent of a middle-grade child, I would want to make decisions about my child's reading myself.

"I'd be appalled that my school librarian had decided to take on the role of censor and deny my child access to a major award-winning book."

The globally successful Harry Potter series has also run into trouble in the US, with some schools restricting access because of fears that it could promote witchcraft.

I remember our elementary school library banning some book when I was there b/c of 'occult' fears (I'm talking in the late 70s/early 80s). Have we truly come no further? Where is the line drawn between protecting children and censoring literature? How does a book win such a prestigious award and get banned from schools and libraries? Who should make the decisions about appropriate reading...schools or parents?

Darkefang
02-19-07, 07:15 AM
How dare books contain the proper medical term for parts of the anatomy! We need to make sure those parts of the body a mystery to our children. After all, what would health class be if kids aren't giggling each time their teacher mentions the name of a part of the genitalia?

Plus, how else can we prevent teenage pregnancy except by removing these terms from the vocabulary of children? Nothing makes kids hornier than hearing words like "scrotum," "fallopian tubes" and "vas deferens."

FarSky
02-19-07, 08:06 AM
So thought this was going to be an "I just discovered boxers!" thread.

Anyway, to lay on the sarcasm...

How dare those evil book-y bastards call things by their proper names! Don't they know that kids won't pay any attention to those things between their legs if we just don't talk about them?!

Scorpiolaw
02-19-07, 08:48 AM
I sense in the future a new version of the book being released where scrotum is replaced by ballsack or some other off color term. Congratulations librarian, you kept the kids from knowing the real name.

What happens when this librarian realizes that there is not only the name but diagrams in science textbooks?

Nenjin
02-19-07, 09:02 AM
Probably replace it with some metaphorical image of like, 2 large AAA eggs in a sandwich baggie.

Kids might get confused though and ask why their bozac doesn't have the 2 color press & seal seam.......

Zeno
02-19-07, 11:41 AM
Kids might get confused though and ask why their bozac doesn't have the 2 color press & seal seam.......

You mean you don't have that?

I guess this one makes a little bit more sense than Harry Potter bannings, but not by much. Scrotum is much better than alternative names, too, is it not?

Nenjin
02-19-07, 11:46 AM
([Insert obligatory response joke about nutsack here])

Morvran
02-19-07, 12:13 PM
So thought this was going to be an "I just discovered boxers!" thread.


Discovered boxers in '92 and never looked back. Was a little late in the game for me (freshman in college) but it was truly an awakening. I will still do the boxer briefs from time to time.

I have possibly also just hijacked my own thread.

korthuran
02-19-07, 01:03 PM
thats ok, my scientific non scientific poll says 99% of all safehousers agree that the book banning is retarded

all posts from here on out will be 25% underwear posts and 75% nut sack posts

Kojeero
02-19-07, 01:11 PM
i agree that for a 9-13 y/o, yes, that's absolutely fine to use, and they OUGHT to know the right words for body parts (i mean comon, everyone knows by 2nd grade what a nutsack is... ). but why did she chose the scrotum? for that i tend to agree with the "shock factor" part of the article. /shrug

korthuran
02-19-07, 01:13 PM
cause she's from england, they don't **** a brick when you mention a body part that half the population is sporting

Ponzi
02-19-07, 01:14 PM
Reminds me of how when I was in elementary school, they pulled the blue "Where's Waldo" book from the library because on the track meet page a naked man was running from the police.

Trolo
02-19-07, 01:17 PM
Have we truly come no further?

No. Progress is a myth perpetuated by young people horrified by the fact that the world won't change before they die.

More on-topic, I propose burning all copies of this book and making our kids read something worthwhile--the Book of Job is always near the top of the list.

Only half this post is sarcastic.

Yalum
02-19-07, 02:40 PM
I'm pretty horrified by the idea of a snakebite to the scrotum...

Lilum
02-19-07, 02:50 PM
No. Progress is a myth perpetuated by young people horrified by the fact that the world won't change before they die.

More on-topic, I propose burning all copies of this book and making our kids read something worthwhile--the Book of Job is always near the top of the list.

Only half this post is sarcastic.

Why Job? Wouldn't the parts about Lot's daughters having incestuous sex with him be a better story? What can be better than the only righteous family getting it on?

ragweed
02-19-07, 04:28 PM
I'm pretty horrified by the idea of a snakebite to the scrotum...

You obviously need to read the best Fark thread ever. The great Ballsack Conundrum (http://forums.fark.com/cgi/fark/comments.pl?IDLink=2018473).

Trolo
02-19-07, 06:08 PM
Job'll teach these damned kids some dedication to a cause.

SnibbsQ
02-19-07, 09:55 PM
Only if they have to read Heinlein's Job as a supplement. >:)

Qutsmnie
02-19-07, 10:06 PM
I thought this was going to be about the need for balls when fighting a global war on terror!