TheSafehouse



A dagger in the dark is worth 1000 swords at dawn




Safehouse Forums



Safehouse Site Info



 

The end is nigh


 

 

 







Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Velvetrose
Velvetrose is offline
Veteran

Join Date: May 2004
Location: Roswell GA


Velvetrose's Avatar

 
Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #1

Has anyone seen it yet?

I wanna go this weekend so I was wondering what people thought.

Loved the first book, liked the second one and thought the writer wimped out on the last one...



The inner Machinations of my mind are an Enigma - Patrick Star
A steel fist in a Velvet glove, the force is there but it's concealed just below the surface.
TeanninBramblefeet
TeanninBramblefeet is offline
Registered Member

Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Hammer is my penis.


TeanninBramblefeet's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #2

Going to see it in about... 30 minutes here. Here's to hoping they don't change much!



Also, the Fed-Ex logo has an arrow in it Toprem.
Velvetrose
Velvetrose is offline
Veteran

Join Date: May 2004
Location: Roswell GA


Velvetrose's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #3

Ok I expect a review then when you get back...


Stalk
Stalk is offline
Veteran

Join Date: Dec 2001


 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #4

I'm reading the first book now. about 60% through!



Synrax
Synrax is offline
Veteran

Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dirty secret


Synrax's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #5

Going to watch it Sunday!


Kambic
Kambic is offline
Veteran

Join Date: Jan 2000


Kambic's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #6

I went to a midnight showing and read the trilogy about a month ago.




Velvetrose
Velvetrose is offline
Veteran

Join Date: May 2004
Location: Roswell GA


Velvetrose's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #7

Kambic said:
I went to a midnight showing and read the trilogy about a month ago.
And??


Lilum
Lilum is offline
Ask me about Testosterone!

Join Date: Mar 2002


Lilum's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #8

I saw it today. I think they did a good job keeping it true to the books. It helps that Collins received a screenplay credit. If you have read, and liked the books there is nothing in it, IMO, that is a deal breaker as far as changes go.


Kambic
Kambic is offline
Veteran

Join Date: Jan 2000


Kambic's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #9

I had a good time. I'm glad I went. As far as the books go, without spoiling anything, I thought book one was alright, book two was good, and book three was mostly good except for an anticlimactic ending (not sure she could have written a climactic one, though, with the direction she took with the books).

The movie was worth seeing. They did stray some, but I'm overly nitpicky about that kind of stuff, so don't worry about that too much. Actually, I wouldn't have even minded if they had cut out a little more of the details, as too often I felt like they were too overtly giving nods towards certain things only readers would be looking for, while making the scenes awkward and possibly not making any sense to non-readers.

I do also think they could have done a better job explaining things, using elements already existent within the movie (but to counter-point I thought the way they used the announcers to explain the tracker jackers was excellent - would have like to have seen more of that). However, this was a constant complaint of mine while reading the books, too, probably because I of reading after authors like Eddings, Jordan, Sanderson, etc. who use natural elements of the story to give proper explanation to the audience. If Collins had done that in the books and if the movie would have consistently followed a similar format I think I'd be sitting here typing this up saying that all three books were fantastic and the movie rivaled the books, but such isn't the case.

I thought the gal who played Katniss (who you might remember from X-Men: First Class) did a very good job. The guy who played Peeta was pretty good, too. I think the guy who did the best in the movie as far as acting goes was whoever played Caesar Flickerman; that was just perfect, spot on. Haymitch wasn't too bad, either. Snow and Effie were also well done. I liked Seneca's look. Cenna was difficult to judge; I couldn't really accept that he was Cenna, because I just kept saying to myself: "That's Lenny Kravitz." You can look up all the actors and actresses if you care to know who they are.



Last edited by Kambic; 03-23-12 at 07:49 PM.
Xynn
Xynn is offline
Veteran

Join Date: May 2004


Xynn's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #10

Caeser Flickman was good because it was Stanley Motherfuddin Tucci


TeanninBramblefeet
TeanninBramblefeet is offline
Registered Member

Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Hammer is my penis.


TeanninBramblefeet's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #11

Ehhh... I wasn't a huge fan, mostly because I feel it rushed through a lot that shouldn't have been rushed. Basically, this movie felt like the 4th Harry Potter movie to me. The book gave this feeling of desperation and loneliness inside the arena that the movie just....... didn't. Seriously, the career pack wandering around having a good time like they're just out in the woods at summer camp really ruined that feel for me. Also, Katniss seems to be entirely incapable of making her own decisions in this movie, whereas I felt her character in the books had a lot more spine and wits, at least where it came to survival. The utter cluelessness about people liking her was done rather well.

Heymitch... well... I felt it was Woody Harrelson playing Capt. Jack Sparrow honestly. And Cinna just came off as like Katniss way more than I felt was appropriate, considering she's supposed to be 16. He was just kinda creepy to me. Most other characters I feel were done fantastically well.

Now... for spoilers, do NOT read if you haven't read through to the end of book 3.

SPOILER:
Also: Peeta doesn't lose his leg, which makes me want to say that at the end of movie 3, they're going to keep Prim alive and just have Kat shoot Snow... I realize that's probably a pretty big leap, but that's just the feeling I got.


Xynn
Xynn is offline
Veteran

Join Date: May 2004


Xynn's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #12

Teannin:
SPOILER:
Didnt they fix up Peeta with an artificial leg that is just as good the real one? Kinda like Luke and his hand? Its been a while since I read them. But if they did, its like "might as well not even bother since he will just be on his leg for the next movie anyway"


ShadowCross
ShadowCross is offline
Ring Administrator

Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Germany


ShadowCross's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #13

Going to see it in an hour, I haven't read the books though.



ShadowCross
Rogue at Heart, Keeper of the Ring, Safehouse Administrator
Retired: ShadowCross - Blade of Tirion, Teir'dal Shadowblade (82), Member of Wind of Tranquility, Ant. Bayle Server, EQ
Retired: Shadowcross, Night Elven Hunter (85), Leader of Túatha Dé Danann, Sen'jin-EU, WoW
Retired: Shadowcross (Minmatar Clan Sebiestor) & Tebryan (retired Caldari Deteis), Members of Fnord Works, Tranquility, EVE
Achiever 40.00%, Explorer 100.00%, Killer 26.67%, Socializer 33.33%
TeanninBramblefeet
TeanninBramblefeet is offline
Registered Member

Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Hammer is my penis.


TeanninBramblefeet's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #14

Xynn said:
Teannin:
SPOILER:
Didnt they fix up Peeta with an artificial leg that is just as good the real one? Kinda like Luke and his hand? Its been a while since I read them. But if they did, its like "might as well not even bother since he will just be on his leg for the next movie anyway"
SPOILER:
I thought that the artificial leg was more or less like modern prosthetics? I seem to recall him being rather heavier on it, not able to keep up at full speed, etc... maybe I'm wrong? Eh, if that's the case, I could just be jumping to more wild conclusions than I already have, hehe.


Xynn
Xynn is offline
Veteran

Join Date: May 2004


Xynn's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #15

SPOILER:
I looked it up and it appears the leg is more like a modern prosthetic one than say Lukes hand, but I think its still supposed to be more advanced than now. It says that he isnt able to be a full part of the future rebellion teams because of it. But its still easy enough to cover up just drop in a line like "It was too torn up from the first Games" and they are good to go and dont have to worry about the makeup/CGI to deal with it.


Velvetrose
Velvetrose is offline
Veteran

Join Date: May 2004
Location: Roswell GA


Velvetrose's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #16

Got back a couple of hours ago and...I liked it yet didn't like it.

I GET that they have to leave some stuff out but it felt like they left TOO much out.


Kambic
Kambic is offline
Veteran

Join Date: Jan 2000


Kambic's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #17

This spoiler includes book spoilers, beware.

SPOILER:
Two concern I had were how little they downplayed the tracker jackers and the complete lack of Katniss's prep team, minus Cinna himself. While in the first book both aspects were not really that important, in the third book the tracker jacker mindwashing of Peeta was a pretty big deal, and Katniss's discovery of her prep team in chains was something of a turning point for her thoughts about the District 13.

Also, the three fingered salute - as I recall that was unique to a different district (Rue's, right?), so having District 12 use it at the beginning was kinda lame. Am I remembering that wrong? I also felt a bit cheated in seeing the uprising from Rue's district, since I do not think we were supposed to know about that until either book two or three.


I do think that this maybe would have been done better as a mini-series.



Last edited by Kambic; 03-24-12 at 09:50 PM.
DarthEnderX
DarthEnderX is offline
Count Monster-rod
Von Hugenstein

Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: NinjaPirate Agency HQ


DarthEnderX's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #18

This is that movie about the guy that falls in love with a Filipino woman that turns out to be a man right?


Stalk
Stalk is offline
Veteran

Join Date: Dec 2001


 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #19

SPOILER:
Three finger salute is a District 12 thing. They do it to Katniss when she volunteers.


Book 1 spoiler.


Kambic
Kambic is offline
Veteran

Join Date: Jan 2000


Kambic's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #20

Stalk said:
SPOILER:
Three finger salute is a District 12 thing. They do it to Katniss when she volunteers.


Book 1 spoiler.
What am I thinking of then? I may be all mixed up.

SPOILER:
Or did Rue's district also do it when Rue died?


Something didn't add up; can't seem to put my finger on it.


Xynn
Xynn is offline
Veteran

Join Date: May 2004


Xynn's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #21

Just checked the wiki and it says:
SPOILER:
That the salute is from District 12. Maybe I missed that part when I read the books, cause I remembered it being a District 11 thing as well.


Morvran
Morvran is offline
Veteran

Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cleveland, OH (Arrivederci Roma)


Morvran's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #22

Kambic said:
I do also think they could have done a better job explaining things, using elements already existent within the movie (but to counter-point I thought the way they used the announcers to explain the tracker jackers was excellent - would have like to have seen more of that).
I felt the way the announcers handled the tracker jacker thing was flimsy and silly. It jumped out as being forced, I think because it was one of the only times they did it. That said, there aren't many other ways they could have thrown that info in aside from setting it up earlier in the film. I wonder if they originally tried to use the announcers to explain a bunch of different things but it ended up slowing down the flow so they just kept the tracker jacker explanation b/c it's needed.

They used silence perfectly. No silly music, and limited soundtrack set the tone nicely throughout, especially at the reaping. But I agree that once they got into the arena they lost some of the suspense. The 'tribute coalition' was too care-free.

Loved Katniss, Gale was good, Haymitch was great, though different from the books, Effe was awesome, Cinna was meh, the rest of the team was downplayed too much.

Peeta....I watched the midnight show Thursday night while chaperoning 14 teen girls (yeah). The theatre was packed, and they laughed over and over at Peeta scenes. I missed the joke every time but one (after the jackers, when Kat is hallucinating and he's trying to get in her face to tell her to run, he looked really goofy). The whole theatre cracked up laughing when Peeta's name is read at the reaping. I mean they were dying laughing every time the camera cut to his stunned face. That's pretty much the opposite effect the director would want, and I felt like I was missing something. It was either just because of the look on the actor's face, or maybe he's done other stuff the kids knew and found funny? I had no idea. But it happened again and again throughout the movie. They also laughed at one of the close-ups of a dead tribute's face for some reason.

SPOILER:
Most glaring issue I had was how they handled the Mutts. I was SOOOOO looking forward to seeing mutated dead tributes, most hauntingly the Rue mutt, but instead we got poorly CGI'd pit bulls. Bleh. That sucked.



Morvran McGuinness {Shanks} *retired Barbarian rogue of the North, Vallon Zek
The more you leave dead, the less you need to watch your back
korthuran
korthuran is offline
Veteran

Join Date: Nov 2002


 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #23

Sounds like you watched it with a terrible audience.


Koru
Koru is offline
Queen Of Chaos

Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Somewhere near the north pole


 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #24

I thought Peeta worked out just fine. He's not supposed to be handsome or dashing or dark, brooding and mysterious. He's the nice guy next door. He's the one who isn't the strongest or the most cunning or ruthless but simply smart. Smart enough to know he can't win by playing the game, but he can give himself a chance by playing to the audience instead.

I thought it was great, it didn't over explain a lot of things. I imagine some things would be slightly confusing for that if you hadn't read the books, but most things you can figure out by context. I mean a whole bunch of people doing a silent salute to someone instead of clapping is not hard to figure out how the crowd feels about the person saluted to - or their feelings towards the authorities telling them to clap.

All in all I thought it was a very good adaptation. Compared to a lot of say, the Harry Potter movies this was really really good. It kept the most relevant parts in, didn't drag on to cover every detail but implied what there wasn't time to explain, and the added scenes I think will come in very hand as the move to film the second book. Seeing a little bit of the politics that are happening behind the games also helps the audience to understand why the gamemakers make the announcements they do. The books are told so exclusively from Katniss point of view it could be difficult to communicate what's going on without lengthy exposition, all the things she keeps finding out later about what's happening while she's in the games.

On the salute: Book 1 spoiler, very minor book 2 spoiler
SPOILER:
In the book she says it's a show of respect, love and way of saying goodbye in her district... but remember common citizens can't travel between districts. So whether it means something similar in other districts... she would have no way of knowing. The citizens in 11 seem to recognize at least the gesture but everything is told from Katniss' perspective in the book and she doesn't know much about the other districts. In the movie Rue's district does do it as a response to seeing Katniss doing it for Rue on the screens. In the book you don't hear about that uprising until into the second book when Katniss starts to see with her own eyes what's been happening outside of the games. It is indicated there that even if they may not share the custom... they at least recognize it's intent as a show of respect for Rue, since in the books the Capitol edits out that she surrounded Rue's body with the flowers.


I do hope a directors cut will have (minor spoiler, book 1)
SPOILER:
More on Cinna's team, just one little scene showing how they view Katniss more as an object and how shallow/self-obsessed they are goes a long way towards showing why Katniss connects so well with Cinna, how he's the first person in the Capitol who treats her as a human being rather than as a thing. Without that contrast Cinna does come off as slightly creepy.


For the future of the movies (major book 3 spoilers)
SPOILER:
Remember they're going to split the third book into two movies, so there will be more time to sell that while district 13 is the center of the rebellion they're just as much about using and controlling people as the capitol. I'm worried they'll let Prim live, but more worried they'll have Katniss kill Snow - it's such a huge part of her story that she's coming to realize that she may just have switched one dictator for another and in the end she doesn't go for the revenge in favor of stopping those future wrongs. It just wouldn't make sense to make her story more disneyesque happy ending after all she's been through at that point, even if Prim is alive there's just so much death she's seen by then. If you keep Prim alive you can at least try to sell that idea of the happily ever after, so that will be a tempting thing to keep in. I really hope Collins puts her foot down on that if they want to push it in that direction.


Xynn
Xynn is offline
Veteran

Join Date: May 2004


Xynn's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #25

Just got back from seeing it. Thought it was pretty good. Lawrence does a pretty good job of portraying Katniss kinda being a bitch. I never pictured Seneca as they portrayed him in the movie, more of a TV producer, but I like how they did it. The careers were nice and cocky. I wish they had been able to spend more time on Haymitch. No character really stands out as "Eh, I dont think they did it right"

SPOILER:
I see what you were all saying about the announcers and the trackerjackers. They either needed to have the announcers cut in and explain more often so it didnt seem so obvious, or my thought was, why not have Caesar Flickman explain it a tiny bit more in her hallucination. He already was talking about it during the hallucination anyway.

Really liked seeing the riot in 11.


Morvran
Morvran is offline
Veteran

Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cleveland, OH (Arrivederci Roma)


Morvran's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #26

korthuran said:
Sounds like you watched it with a terrible audience.
They were horrible. I think maybe because there were so many large groups of teens that had just been dropped off by their parents. There was a group of 10 8th grade boys that were messy and obnoxious prior to the start and then were loud a couple times during. Honestly, it's what I expected at the midnight show...and in some ways I expected it to be worse. I'm looking forward to going at a normal time with two people who haven't read the books.

SPOILER:
I forgot to mention, I was sorry to see they saved the Avox content for the next movie (I assume). It could have added another nice creepy element to the movie


Xynn
Xynn is offline
Veteran

Join Date: May 2004


Xynn's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #27

Thats so odd Morv. The midnight showings around here are almost universally huge fans who would jump on anyone who is that disruptive.


Synrax
Synrax is offline
Veteran

Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dirty secret


Synrax's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #28

Thought the movie was good and worth watching but I don't see the media hype of this being worthy of such a large blockbuster.


Now Prometheus, that looks epic. Where's the thread for this movie.



Last edited by Synrax; 03-25-12 at 04:05 PM.
Sillis
Sillis is online now
Veteran

Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Herndon, Va


 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #29

Saw it. Enjoyed it. Haven't read the books.

Some parts made me roll my eyes, and way too much was predictable, but still enjoyable.



Everyone should get banned at least once.
korthuran
korthuran is offline
Veteran

Join Date: Nov 2002


 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #30

I haven't read the books yet. I was wary going into it but something about it really made it stick in my head. I think it's the scene with District 11. That was very well done.

I'm hoping the next movies will do what the Harry Potter series did and get better as it found its legs.


Kambic
Kambic is offline
Veteran

Join Date: Jan 2000


Kambic's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #31

Sillis said:
Saw it. Enjoyed it. Haven't read the books.

Some parts made me roll my eyes, and way too much was predictable, but still enjoyable.
Book 1 was very predictable.

I did not think Book 2 was nearly as predictable, and it was my favorite of the three, so I have high hopes for the sequel movie.


ShadowCross
ShadowCross is offline
Ring Administrator

Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Germany


ShadowCross's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #32

Saw it, enjoyed it a lot ( Jennifer Lawrence) and ordered the 3 books right away. Looking forward to reading them


Velvetrose
Velvetrose is offline
Veteran

Join Date: May 2004
Location: Roswell GA


Velvetrose's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #33

Synrax said:

Now Prometheus, that looks epic. Where's the thread for this movie.
I WANNA like this movie, but I can't hear the title without thinking...AND BOB


Fricka
Fricka is offline
Forums Administrator

Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Online


Fricka's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #34

I'm glad I read this thread.

I saw it Saturday and haven't decided what I think of it. I think the problem is that I read the books too close to seeing the movie. AND I re-read book one, finishing it right before seeing the movie. So while the movie did follow the book closely, it was almost bad that it did because then I was thinking, "OK, now what comes next is this scene..." and if it didn't then I was distracted.

I think I would've liked the movie a lot if I had maybe read the books years ago and forgotten a lot of details, or just not read the books at all.

I agree with the comment on the music, I was glad they didn't over do it.

I also agree with a lot of what has been said in the Spoiler tags too.

Koru
SPOILER:
You're right about the three finger gesture, it's one of the things that distracted me when they showed that. Also how Katniss gets the Mockingjay pin from the Hob... though I completely understand cutting out Madge to make the story shorter/less complicated for film



Fricka
Safehouse Forums Administrator - Wielder of the Whip of Administration (TM)
Fricka curtsies elegantly...while picking your pocket!
My gaming store, now with iPhone & iPad cases!
Kambic
Kambic is offline
Veteran

Join Date: Jan 2000


Kambic's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #35

SPOILER:
I don't expect many here to appreciate this, but... I was also disappointed I had to wait all the way until the credits to finally hear the Taylor Swift song she did for the movie. Hello? Why not actually use it, you know, in the movie...


Velvetrose
Velvetrose is offline
Veteran

Join Date: May 2004
Location: Roswell GA


Velvetrose's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #36

I don't even remember ANY of the music


Blusco
Blusco is offline
Registered Member

Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Seattle, WA


Blusco's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #37

I enjoyed it but the camera-work was really nauseating and I had to keep my eyes closed for over half of it. I HATE that close-up, really-narrow-focus, jerky-camera style.


Xynn
Xynn is offline
Veteran

Join Date: May 2004


Xynn's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #38

Anyone else think the Peacekeepers looked like rejects from a 70s sci-fi movie?


korthuran
korthuran is offline
Veteran

Join Date: Nov 2002


 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #39

Just read the books to see what was left out. As others mentioned it was a surprisingly faithful adaptation. I really want to see the directors cut. I have a feeling it would be damn near perfect as far as including content goes.


PsiKoTicK
PsiKoTicK is offline
Veteran

Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Hilton Head, SC


PsiKoTicK's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #40

Saw it last night, was pretty good... Jennifer Lawrence is amazingly attractive, btw

I found it pretty predictable, unfortunately... haven't read the book yet (I am like, 3 pages in) but I still saw pretty much every plot twist coming a mile away. It was still pretty good, but nothing mind blowing.

Having seen the summary of the other 2 books there were some definite undertones that others may have missed (the president being so serious and controlling, about why there has ot be a victor, etc) but it was still worth seeing


Velvetrose
Velvetrose is offline
Veteran

Join Date: May 2004
Location: Roswell GA


Velvetrose's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #41

Derailing my own thread...anyone see 21 Jump Street?

I just got back and it was hilarious.

Defiantly go see it


Xynn
Xynn is offline
Veteran

Join Date: May 2004


Xynn's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #42

Yeah, I laughed a lot at it.


korthuran
korthuran is offline
Veteran

Join Date: Nov 2002


 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #43

PsiKoTicK said:
Saw it last night, was pretty good... Jennifer Lawrence is amazingly attractive, btw

I found it pretty predictable, unfortunately... haven't read the book yet (I am like, 3 pages in) but I still saw pretty much every plot twist coming a mile away. It was still pretty good, but nothing mind blowing.

Having seen the summary of the other 2 books there were some definite undertones that others may have missed (the president being so serious and controlling, about why there has ot be a victor, etc) but it was still worth seeing
*Possible but very vague spoilers*

Even the book isn't really full of plot twists. It does set up nicely the second two though which brings the big picture into focus.


Zeno
Zeno is offline
E-peen attack now has chance of causing Stun!

Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Texas


Zeno's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #44

My wife and I read the books when they came out, so there's some years there to blur the exact details while retaining the overall feel and love for characters.

If I hadn't read the books, I wouldn't have been as bothered by
SPOILER:
Rue's death. The POV of her death with Catniss singing above her in the corner of the screen was pretty brilliant. I was moved. They had to retain a PG-13 rating, so I understand some of the shaky cam stuff rather than ultra detailed gore/action scenes.


Wife and I were both very happy with the movie adaptation and the casting. I was very happy with Elizabeth Banks. I guess the books were really detailed with Ms. Violet's voice as that is EXACTLY how I pictured her sounding and looking like. Elizabeth Banks also has been a little bit typecasted in the past, yet I've love her since Slither, so I was glad she did such a great job matching that part. I really liked Lenny Kravitz, too. Woody Harrelson was good, but in reading the books, I always pictured an older character. I think Jeff Bridges would've been better. Jennifer Lawrence and Josh Hutchison(?) were great casting. I pictured Gale different but I guess I can't complain, the actor didn't do anything wrong so far.

Sure, they had to leave out some details, but I personally feel these books will make a better film adaptation than Harry Potter and LOTR, and I was happy with the casting, acting, and cinematography.

My only complaint? Same complaint I had with the books. Where the hell is the explanation for the Hunger Games technology? It's sci-fi/fantasy without the background.

If they can just spawn any sort of organism, terrain feature, weather, etc, into a large arena, it seems like they don't need to be living in the type of society they live in to begin with. Why set up cheapass fences around the districts when you can set up miniature arena boundaries with packs of wolves constantly keeping people in check? Or just a spawn point for organisms that do all the resource harvesting for them? All sorts of possibilities that make that civilization all-powerful while not even having to worry about a rebel uprising.


korthuran
korthuran is offline
Veteran

Join Date: Nov 2002


 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #45

On a side note. I wish there was a different rating system that would allow them to properly show the events in a book/movie like this. The PG-13 **** just doesn't allow the director any shot at doing it justice. As it is an R rating kills it at the box office and I think trying to squeeze it in as PG-13 ruins a lot of movies. I would have really loved to see them play up the contrast between the districts, the French bourgeoisie capitol, and the arena but I guess that would scar all of the little kids. Not that they would fully understand it anyway.


Thwick
Thwick is offline
Veteran

Join Date: Aug 2000


Thwick's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #46

Zeno said:
My only complaint? Same complaint I had with the books. Where the hell is the explanation for the Hunger Games technology? It's sci-fi/fantasy without the background.

If they can just spawn any sort of organism, terrain feature, weather, etc, into a large arena, it seems like they don't need to be living in the type of society they live in to begin with. Why set up cheapass fences around the districts when you can set up miniature arena boundaries with packs of wolves constantly keeping people in check? Or just a spawn point for organisms that do all the resource harvesting for them? All sorts of possibilities that make that civilization all-powerful while not even having to worry about a rebel uprising.
I just finished book 1 and this bugged me too. I figure that it's the easiest way for the Capitol to keep the population as "slaves" without them realizing they are. It keeps the workforce intact and downtrodden without them committing mass suicide and rising up again.


Zeno
Zeno is offline
E-peen attack now has chance of causing Stun!

Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Texas


Zeno's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #47

Okay, but there's still the fact that the capitol is basically hundreds if not thousands of years into the future technology-wise compared to the outlying districts, and as far as we know, creating organisms is free. Sure, arena space is limited, but since people can be transported in/out of arena, so could the artificial creations.

How can a district that only has homemade bows + arrows as a weapon, and is starving, overthrow a government that can literally spawn organisms, fireballs, lightning strikes, etc from nothing?

I guess the idea is their culture loves violent blood sports and keeps it up for their amusement.

There's just some discrepancy I can't quite put my finger on that ruins my suspension of disbelief sometimes (even while reading the books). Maybe it's just that I'm used to sci-fi and fantasy novels actually *explaining* technology or magic rather than them just existing willy-nilly with no background.


ShadowCross
ShadowCross is offline
Ring Administrator

Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Germany


ShadowCross's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #48

PsiKoTicK said:
Saw it last night, was pretty good... Jennifer Lawrence is amazingly attractive, btw
Get in the line I already called dibs :p


Koru
Koru is offline
Queen Of Chaos

Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Somewhere near the north pole


 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #49

They do point out later that the technology is very controlled exactly so it won't be used against them and without that access they do have one other weapon...
Book 3 spoilers
SPOILER:

Without district 13's tech the other districts wouldn't really stand a chance in an armed conflict. But even without that, the districts wouldn't have to beat Capitol in a shooting war. Capitol is completely dependent on the districts for food and other resources. In book 2 people in Capitol start to complain because they can't get so and so luxury foods they've become accustomed to, that's after fairly minor uprisings compared to what starts to happen in book 3. That's why they have to maintain such an iron grip on the districts, all it would take would be enough of a conflict in all the food production districts for an extended period of time and Capitol's food supplies runs out - and long before that it risks it's spoiled citizens rebelling. That's why they have to maintain their hunger games, they can't risk people realizing just how vulnerable their dependency on the districts has really made them.

As for why don't they use their awesome tech to feed themselves. Well, it's mostly smokes and mirrors. As you see in book 2 (and in the movie in the games control center) a lot of what's happening in that arena isn't real. It's a cross between a high tech movie set and a star trek type holodeck. Even the genetically engineered mutations they have created they don't have great control over, what with the mockingjays being the result of breeding between one of the mutated weapons and ordinary mocking birds. Both the people watching and the tributes of course believe this to be real - Katniss herself in book 2 seems surprised when she finds out that it was all a lie, that the flights they took to the arenas were fake and the arena was always the same arena no matter how different it looked.

There's never any indication that they have advanced robotics, refined enough genetic engineering to create a pliable enough servant creature that it would be usable on a mass scale or that they have matter replication mastered. And of course historically having access to easy slave labor doesn't tend to motivate people to do anything other than perfect means of controlling their slaves.


Zeno
Zeno is offline
E-peen attack now has chance of causing Stun!

Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Texas


Zeno's Avatar

 
Re: Hunger Games
Reply With Quote   #50

Koru said:
They do point out later that the technology is very controlled exactly so it won't be used against them and without that access they do have one other weapon...
Book 3 spoilers
SPOILER:

Without district 13's tech the other districts wouldn't really stand a chance in an armed conflict. But even without that, the districts wouldn't have to beat Capitol in a shooting war. Capitol is completely dependent on the districts for food and other resources. In book 2 people in Capitol start to complain because they can't get so and so luxury foods they've become accustomed to, that's after fairly minor uprisings compared to what starts to happen in book 3. That's why they have to maintain such an iron grip on the districts, all it would take would be enough of a conflict in all the food production districts for an extended period of time and Capitol's food supplies runs out - and long before that it risks it's spoiled citizens rebelling. That's why they have to maintain their hunger games, they can't risk people realizing just how vulnerable their dependency on the districts has really made them.

As for why don't they use their awesome tech to feed themselves. Well, it's mostly smokes and mirrors. As you see in book 2 (and in the movie in the games control center) a lot of what's happening in that arena isn't real. It's a cross between a high tech movie set and a star trek type holodeck. Even the genetically engineered mutations they have created they don't have great control over, what with the mockingjays being the result of breeding between one of the mutated weapons and ordinary mocking birds. Both the people watching and the tributes of course believe this to be real - Katniss herself in book 2 seems surprised when she finds out that it was all a lie, that the flights they took to the arenas were fake and the arena was always the same arena no matter how different it looked.

There's never any indication that they have advanced robotics, refined enough genetic engineering to create a pliable enough servant creature that it would be usable on a mass scale or that they have matter replication mastered. And of course historically having access to easy slave labor doesn't tend to motivate people to do anything other than perfect means of controlling their slaves.
Thanks, it's been years since I read the books.

Still not seeing how it's mostly smoke and mirrors, though. People get injured and killed by fireballs, lightning, and whatever beasts they spawn, so it's not like those beasts don't physically exist. So do the plants and trees. So why not just spawn some of your own meat and crops in the arena during the Hunger Games off-season, and feed your capitol for "free"? Not sure what the cost of the arena resources are.

Oddly enough, wife and I remember 1st and 3rd books better than 2nd book. I don't really remember much of what happened in 2nd one.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump







 
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:07 PM.
All posts are
© Copyright 2004-2006 The Safehouse Network